| （1.Department of Physical Education，Lanzhou City University，Lanzhou 730070，China；2.School of Physical Education，Northwest Normal University，Lanzhou 730070，china） Abstract: Basing the criteria on ideology and methodology of modern theories, applying basic views of historical materialism, and according to realities, the authors studied the new round of physical education curriculum reform, and thought that in physical education curriculum there is opposition between ideals and realities, which mainly embodies in the followings: the theoretical bases of new physical education curriculum reform are not applicable to the realities of teaching in China; relatively stable curriculum thinking inertia formed under the power centralized curriculum management system was unable to timely adapt to the 3-level management system; idealized curriculum power sharing resulted in the “impotence” or “abuse” of the curriculum subject in power exercising; relatively lagged physical education teacher cultivation and training system failed to meet the higher requirements of the new curriculum reform for teacher teams. The authors put forward suggestions such as correctly recognize the sign of opposition between ideals and realities, seek for the point of balance between learning, inheritance and develop-ment, establish a curriculum implementation monitoring mechanism, etc.
Key words: school physical education；physical education curriculum；new curriculum objective |
