|College of Physical Education，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079，China)
Abstract: Based on their observation on the juridical supervision mechanism of the sports arbitration court, the au-thors considered that under the framework of the existing Arbitration Law, a sport arbitration supervision mecha-nism should include such three forms as internal supervision, industrial supervision and juridical supervision. Dur-ing the design of a sports arbitration supervision mechanism, attention should be paid to such issues as the party concerned being lack of necessary relief channels after the double supervision, double examination, double standard or arbitration decision of the People’s Court is wrongly discharged or not executed in arbitration practice. The author put forward the following suggestions for constructing a sports arbitration supervision mechanism: A supervision mechanism should be established within the Sports Arbitration Committee to strengthen internal supervision; only the arbitration decision discharging system should be specified for judicial review of sports arbitration decisions; the judicial review of sports arbitration decisions executed by the People’s Court should be limited to procedure review except that “public interests” are involved with; the range of judicial review of domestic and foreign party involved sports arbitration should be unified; the sports arbitration institution should be given the right to object in the legis-lation of Sport Arbitration Rules.
Key words: sports arbitration; supervision mechanism; juridical supervision