(1.Department of Physical Education,Hebei Polytechnic University,Tangshan 063009,China; 2.Department of Physical Education,Xingtai Institute,Xingtai 054000,China) Abstract: The authors raised a few questions about the mainstream viewpoint of and theoretical support for the monistic training theory, and drew the following conclusions: The mainstream text of the monistic training theory is a sort of super regularized text that represents individual opinions; we could not deny the objective existence of tal-ents as well as theoretical recognition; rules for citation must refer to a standard; the effect of citing “secondary lit-erature” should be further discussed; experiences without scientific refutation cannot replace conclusions; the sup-porters of the monistic training theory fail to break away from the entanglement of fixed thinking manner. The au-thors aimed at boosting the process of self-criticism, development and breakthrough of the monistic training theory. At the end of this article the authors offered some suggestions to support the “monistic training theory”. Key words: science of sports training; monistic training theory; argument citation |