| （1.Department of Criminal Justice，Shanghai University of Political Sciences and Law，Shanghai 201701，China；2.Sports Law Center，Shanghai University of Political Sciences and Law，Shanghai 201701，China） Abstract: Based on such a logical start point as that Olympic sports arbitration by CAS is different from ordinary arbitration, the author demonstrated the relations between Olympic sports arbitration by CAS and procedural justice, as well as the necessity for Olympic sports arbitration by CAS to comply with procedural justice, and put forward the following opinions: while Olympic sports arbitration by CAS is boosting the development of the international sports law, its juridical characteristics become ever increasingly evident; the homogenization of Olympic sports ar-bitration by CAS and judicial litigation will enable the principle of procedural justice to be complied with in Olym-pic sports arbitration by CAS, which will be the important assurance for impartial verdicts delivered in Olympic sports arbitration by CAS; basic requirements for the assurance for the procedural justice of Olympic sports arbitra-tion by CAS mainly include principles for such aspects as neutrality of arbitration, timeliness of arbitration, listening to debates conducted by the parties concerned and examining evidence presented by the parties concerned, formal justice, providing reasons for verdict delivery, etc.
Key words: sport law；sports arbitration；Olympic Games；procedural justice；CAS |
