| （1.School of Physical Education，South China University of Technology，Guangzhou 510641，China；2.Department of Physical Education，Hunan International Economics College，Changsha 410205，China） Abstract: The authors analyzed the differences and connections between “knowledge” and “expertise”, pointed out that “knowledge” and “expertise” can neither be totally mixed up nor be completely separated, but should be or-ganically combined and benignly interacting. The authors considered that the problems about “knowledge” and “expertise” faced by postgraduates pursuing a Master of Science of Physical Education degree can be summed up as how to properly deal with the relationships between basic researches and applied researches as well as between the-ory learning and event specific training. By means of information analysis, the authors considered that the major problem existing in the growth of postgraduates pursuing a Master of Science of Physical Education degree is the tendency of “admiring expertise more than knowledge” but not “skill deficiency”. The authors also retrospected misunderstandings about the “knowledge” and “expertise” of postgraduates pursuing a Master of Science of Physi-cal Education degree from the perspective of “what is university”, and considered that postgraduates pursuing a Master of Science of Physical Education degree should shower attention on the enhancement of their scientific re-search abilities in stead of focus on various realistic interests.
Key words: school physical education；“knowledge” and “expertise”；postgraduate pursuing a Master of Science degree |
