|（1.School of Sport Science，Guiyang University，Guiyang 550050，China；
2.School of Sport Science，Fujian Normal University，Fuzhou 350000，China；
3.School of Sport Science，Wenzhou University，Wenzhou 325000，China)
Abstract: By analyzing the disciplinary nature of science of physical education training, the authors probed into problems existing in doctoral student cultivation and their intrinsic causes, and put forward the following opinions: (1) the scientificity of science of physical education training itself is kind of low, which is contradictory to large scale doctoral student cultivation; such contradiction is caused by such two types of tension as extrinsic realistic need and intrinsic academic soundness insufficiency; (2) there is an obvious sign of “trespassing” existing in the se-lection of thesis topics by doctoral students majoring in science of physical education training; such a sign of “tres-passing” is the inevitable result of scientificity insufficiency of scientific of physical education training itself; (3) science of physical education training has the typical nature of sports practice; the cultivation of professionals for such a discipline should be in conformity with its disciplinary nature; such a strategy as focusing primarily on ap-plication type professionals and secondly on scientific research type professionals should be stuck to; (4) the “sci-ence community of” of physical education science should profoundly realize sports practical characteristics of physical education science itself, specify the fundamental functions of physical education teaching and sports train-ing in physical education science; (5) researchers should, from the trans-disciplinary perspective and with the help of research paradigms for psychology, physiology, sociology and management science, study problems in physical education and sports training, so as to promote research scientificity.
Key words: school physical education；science of physical education training；doctoral student