| （1.Sports Law Center，Shanghai University of Political Science and Law，Shanghai 201701，China；2.Jiangsu Sports Industry and Health Research Institute，Soochow University，Suzhou 215021，China) Abstract: A crucial task in Chinese sports legal governance construction is to establish a mediation, arbitration and litigation included multifunctional sports dispute settlement system. By applying methods such as literature data study, comparison and case analysis, the authors analyzed the current Chinese sports dispute settlement predicament caused by failure to implement article 33 in the Sports Law, mainly analyzed and demonstrated the objective and system arrangements of Chinese sports dispute settlement system establishment, and drew the following conclu-sions: establishing a multifunctional, open, highly efficient, fair and various dispute subject options respected mul-tifunctional sports dispute settlement system is the objective of Chinese sports dispute settlement system construc-tion in the new era; among such 4 dispute settlement system arrangements as “litigation but no arbitration”, “arbitra-tion but no litigation”, “arbitration and then litigation” and “arbitration or litigation”, the “arbitration or litigation” mechanism should become the first option.
Key words: sports law；sports dispute；sports arbitration；sports legal governance |
