(School of Law，Wuhan University，Wuhan 430072，China) Abstract: The case of Sun Zhiqiang in a dispute with Chengju Cup sports club involves the accurate meaning of‘competitive sports disputes in the Article 32 of the Sports Law, which also reflects the dilemma of China's sports judicial intervention in the mass sports events dispute, which belongs to civil dispute and the Article 32 of the Sports Law is not suitable for adjusting. Based on the rights of the contestants, the judiciary should intervene in disputes in an appropriate occasion, and using the rules of appraisers and the principle of non-interference in the result of competition, which can properly deal with the special problems of public sports events dispute. Meanwhile, in order to be compatible with the particularity of mass sports events dispute and the generality of dealing with cases by the court, it is suggested to adopt the following measures, including clarifying the scope of the cases, optimizing the system of auxiliary personnel with sports experts, and paying attention to the mediation of the court in disputes, so as to improve the judicial procedures of the public sports events dispute.
Key words: sporting justice；mass sports events dispute；Sports Law of People's Republic of China；sports arbitration |
