(1.School of Law，Hunan University of Technology，Zhuzhou 412007，China； 2.School of Physical Education，Hunan University of Technology，Zhuzhou 412007，China) Abstract: As a key hub for national governance and autonomy for the sports industry, the internal sports dispute resolution mechanism contains the value logic of the new paradigm of social governance, which highlights the integration dimensions of the concept of “co-construction, co-governance, and sharing” and the autonomy of the sports industry. Through the methods of literature, comparative analysis and others, on the basis of discussing the institutional meaning of co-construction, co-governance and sharing and the new context of sports governance, this study analyzes the multiple development logic of the internal sports dispute resolution mechanism in the transformation of social governance paradigm, and concludes that the current sports dispute resolution mechanism has problems such as unclear scope of judicial intervention, vague legal basis, poor coordination between litigation and non-litigation relief mechanisms, and the lack of guild power regulation and other issues. Therefore, it is necessary for the national sports administrative department, judicial organs and other relevant public authorities to work together and take multiple measures, taking national laws and regulations and contracts as the source of power, and taking into account the rights of the parties and the social order as the orientation, to form a bottom-up running dimension between national and non-governmental sports organization. Construct a multiple internal sports dispute resolution mechanism based on the normative autonomy of sports guilds, backed by alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and by orderly judicial intervention, and organic coordination of various dispute resolution methods. Keywords: sports law；sports governance；internal sports disputes；multiple resolution mechanism；social governance paradigm |
