(School of Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100091,China) Abstract: The construction of Chinese sports arbitration system not only follows the development trend of international sports arbitration, but also reflects the characteristics of China, with notable domestic highlights such as parallelism between ex-official and independent operation, dynamic balance between efficiency and justice orientation, organic unity between sports autonomy and judicial intervention, dynamical interaction between voluntary and compulsory arbitration, and integrated promotion of domestic and foreign-related rule of law. However, there are also some shortcomings in Chinese sports arbitration, such as the independence of arbitration needs to be further improved, the scope of arbitration needs to be further clarified, the interface with other dispute resolution methods needs to be further strengthened, and the coordination with international sports arbitration needs to be further clarified. In order to promote the better implementation of sports arbitration in China, it is necessary to achieve the organizational independence and rule-making autonomy of Chinese sports arbitration institutions as soon as possible, assure the jurisdictional application of composite sports disputes, clarify the meaning of the clause "other disputes arising in the course of competitive sports activities", improve the relationship between sports arbitration and internal dispute resolution mechanisms of sports organizations and domestic courts, and also clarify the jurisdiction of international sports arbitration and whether specific disputes can be appealed to the court of international arbitration for sport. Keywords: sports law;sports disputes;sports arbitration;arbitration rules;arbitration institutions
|